This can sometimes be named a bit cryptically, called something like "iGPU Multi-Mon". The 55' 4K at 7ft was noticeably better and didn't seem to have the tearing effect as the 1080p, but could still see some minor issues. Under Sensors Tab -> open blue iris in the background -> then check GPU loadĥ) You also sometimes have to find the BIOS option that allows the integrated graphics to remain active while you have a PCIe graphics card installed. Using Nvenc x265 with surprising results : r/PleX The 50' 1080p TV at 10ft definitely showed more artifacts and minor tearing during high action scenes, but was not awful by any means. Otherwise if you want faster encode times, switch to Intel Quick Sync, or use another program that can make use of NVENC with your Nvidia card. If the encoding time is not an issue, I would continue to stick with x265. Learn How to Roll Back Your Driver to a Previous Versionģ) If you're running h.265 blue iris will turn off hardware acceleration. Intel Quick Sync would be significantly faster than x265, but the quality will not be as good. ![]() This can sometimes be named a bit cryptically, called something like "iGPU Multi-Mon."ġ) If you feel it is not working please disable Quick Sync through Blue Iris and see if you see an increase in the CPU %Ģ) You can also rollback your intel drivers as some new drivers cause quick sync to stop working - follow he link below to make sure you do it the correct way: Typical x265 HEVC encode times (approximate) 60-minute 1080p video 3 min (compared to 1. Usually it's no loss, because the CPU power required to live encode a full hd or bigger video with h.265 is more than the common CPU is able to provide. In hardware Intel QuickSync, AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC. There have been some decent speed improvements since then, so you may want to use something like MeGui so you can use a more recent version of x265. The current version of x265 is now in 1.9 while Handbrake still only contains version 1.5 of x265. ![]() It isn't there, not even in custom ffmpeg output. Currently x265 has the best quality/per bit for H.265. This doesn't seem useful, I'd stick with the default nvenc encoder preset, or switch to x265 if you want quality.With many motherboards, you need to find the BIOS option that allows the integrated graphics to remain active while you have a PCIe graphics card installed. No, it isn't possible to use a h.265 software encoder with OBS. The quality was still worse than the software encode, and encoded at around 250fps. This produced a file which was only a very slight improvement in quality for 2mb smaller output size (not significant). I could have set the x265 software encoder to veryslow, or tweaked some of the more advanced settings to produce an even higher quality file, but at this point encoding speeds drop to below 30fps which is too slow for my needs, so I'm going to stick with the medium quality software x265.Īside: I played a bit around with quality settings, dialling NVENC down to "slowest". If you needed to bulk-encode a lot of video that you didn't want to archive, I would pick this easily. On a laptop! It's ridiculous how fast this is. X264 is more widely used and provides higher video quality. In today's video I compare all of the major streaming encoders - X264 vs NVENC vs AMF/VCE vs. NVIDIA NVENC has a quicker encode/decode process and is more efficient in terms of power consumption. NVENC vs AMF/VCE vs QuickSync vs X264 - ULTIMATE Encoder Quality Analysis 2020 Welcome to the ULTIMATE video encoder quality analysis for 2020. Software x265: about 90fps, which is pretty nice (although this is only 720p) Generally, NVENC is better for graphics-intensive applications where X264 offers better quality for most video encoding tasks. Software is very slow and still immature - x. ![]() ![]() Was it still watchable though? Actually yeah, it wasn't bad, but putting them side by side, the software encode was the obvious winner every time. Fastest is NVEnc, Intel QSV is slower but provide better quality (and support 10 bit in hybrid ). A lot more compression artifacts and loss of fine detail. Watching the output, the NVENC was *clearly* worse quality. I found that x265 software encoder running with the "medium" Encoder Preset using RF 30 produced about the same file size (Approx 135MB) as NVENC 265 running at "medium" Encoder Preset using RF 30. I'm not going for super high quality, just enough to be watchable. Source Material was a 720p video, about 24 minutes long.Machine is a laptop with an Intel Core i9-12900HK and an NVidia RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU. I ran some basic tests today using Handbrake 1.5.1, tweaking encoding settings to aim for approximately the same file size, then seeing which one was better quality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |